Kelly M. Shockman v. Cory J. Shockman
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026) Amendment history from the Minnesota Revisor of Statutes. A later amendment does not necessarily affect this decision's analysis — check the current statute text.Cites Minnesota statutes amended since this decision
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Minnesota statutes cited
Sections of the Minnesota Statutes this opinion cites.
Opinion
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN COURT OF APPEALS
A15-1002
Kelly M. Shockman, petitioner, Respondent, vs.
Cory J. Shockman,
Appellant.
Filed May 16, 2016
Affirmed
Smith, Tracy, Judge
Anoka County District Court File No. 02-FA-12-218
Kurt Robinson, Kurt Robinson, P.A., Blaine, Minnesota (for respondent) Carrie A. Doom, David M. Kula, McKinnis & Doom, P.A., Cambridge, Minnesota (for appellant)
Considered and decided by Reyes, Presiding Judge; Ross, Judge; and Smith, Tracy, Judge.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
SMITH, TRACY, Judge
Appellant Cory Shockman appeals the district court’s order granting respondent Kelly Shockman’s motion requesting a child-support modification and conduct-based attorney fees. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion when it modified the child-support award and ordered conduct-based attorney fees, we affirm.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.