Minnesota Court of Appeals, 2021

Minnesota Court of Appeals Special Rules of Practice. ADM10-8010, Court of Appeals Adminstrative Order, January 4, 2021

Minnesota Court of Appeals Special Rules of Practice. ADM10-8010, Court of Appeals Adminstrative Order, January 4, 2021
Minnesota Court of Appeals · Decided January 4, 2021
Minnesota Court of Appeals Special Rules of Practice. ADM10-8010, Court of Appeals Adminstrative Order, January 4, 2021

Opinion

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN COURT OF APPEALS

Minnesota Court of Appeals Special Rules of Practice.

O R D E R

#ADM10-8010

BASED ON THE FILE, RECORD, AND PROCEEDINGS, AND BECAUSE the court has approved and adopted minor amendments to rule 4 of the Special Rules of Practice for the Minnesota Court of Appeals.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED amendments to the Special Rules of Practice for the Minnesota Court of Appeals are promulgated, effective January 4, 2021.

Dated: January 4, 2021

BY THE COURT

__________________________ Susan L. Segal Chief Judge January 4, 2021 SPECIAL RULES OF PRACTICE FOR THE MINNESOTA COURT OF APPEALS

Effective Oct. 25, 1991

Including Amendments Through January 4, 2021

INTRODUCTION These rules are informational for the practitioner and directive for the court. They are complementary to the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. These rules are subject to change without prior notice.

The special rules enable lawyers to understand the mechanics of the Court’s procedure, provide a basis for evaluation and improvement of the administration of the Court, and promote public understanding of the judicial deliberative process.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991

Rule 1. Scheduling Cases Placement on the calendar is in order of filing, except that cases involving child custody or juvenile protection will be given priority. Other cases may be expedited by rule, by statute, or by motion, based on a showing of good cause. Cases may be scheduled as soon as one responsive brief is filed.

If a case pending in the Supreme Court will be dispositive of a case pending before the Court of Appeals, the Chief Judge may order that scheduling be deferred until the Supreme Court has acted. Counsel should inform the court if they believe a case may be controlled by a case pending in the Supreme Court.

Counsel must advise the clerk, in writing before the case is scheduled, of any conflicts which will limit their availability for argument, and counsel must continue to file updated notices until the case has been scheduled. The Clerk of the Appellate Courts will notify counsel approximately one month in advance of the conference or hearing date, specifying the location of oral argument, if any, and the identity of the panel members assigned to the case.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991; amended eff. Oct. 7, 2010 Rule 2. Oral Argument

Members of the Minnesota Bar and attorneys admitted pro hac vice by the Court of Appeals may argue before the court. If any litigant is without counsel, the case will be submitted on the briefs and record, without oral arguments by any party. Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 134.01 sets out circumstances in which oral argument will not be allowed. Waiver of argument is governed by Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 134.05 and 134.06.

Appellants are allowed 15 minutes to present their principal arguments, respondents are allowed 15 minutes (to be divided, in cases involving multiple respondents), and appellants are allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal. Arguments are held in the Judicial Center in St. Paul and at appropriate locations in other judicial districts, as provided in Minn. Stat. § 480A.09, subd. 1 and Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 134.09, subd. 2.

A motion to reset or postpone oral argument must be made in writing, with a copy to opposing counsel, in accordance with Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 134.02. Reasons for the request must be stated. The court will reset a case only upon a showing of extreme emergency and no more than once. However, the court may reschedule cases on its own motion.

Counsel may use exhibits from the record (or enlargements of such exhibits) as graphic aids during oral argument. If counsel intends to use graphic aids for illustrative purposes, counsel must provide two days’ notice to the court and opposing counsel and provide to the marshal four copies of the graphic aid on 8 ½ x 11-inch paper. Counsel must make arrangements prior to hearing with the court’s receptionist or with the local court administrator for the use of easels. It is the responsibility of counsel to ensure that any trial exhibit to be used is obtained prior to argument. The court prefers that counsel identify the location of pertinent exhibits in the district court record or addenda to the parties’ briefs, rather than using electronic equipment to display exhibits during oral arguments.

Arguments are recorded by the court. Audio recordings of oral arguments occurring after January 1, 2019 are publicly available on the Minnesota Judicial Branch website. Prior approval of the Chief Judge or presiding judge is required to take photographs or to record or videotape oral argument. The media may cover proceedings in accordance with rules adopted by the Supreme Court.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991; amended eff. Oct. 7, 2010; amended eff. July 18, 2016; amended eff. Sept. 13, 2018 Rule 3. Panels

Oral and non-oral cases will be assigned to panels of at least three judges as set forth in Minn. Stat. § 480A.08. One of the judges will be named by the Chief Judge to preside. If a judge assigned to the panel does not participate, the Chief Judge will assign another judge to the panel. Panels decide cases immediately following oral arguments and hold scheduled conferences to decide non-oral cases. After a decision is made, the presiding judge assigns preparation of the opinion to a member of the panel.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991

Rule 4. Opinions

Opinions state the nature of the case and the reasons for the decision. The panel will decide at its conference whether to issue a precedential opinion. The decision on the form of the written opinion is guided by Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(b). Opinions designated as nonprecedential, opinions previously designated as unpublished, and order opinions may be cited for persuasive value or as authorized by rule 136.01. If any counsel intends at an oral argument to refer to an opinion that was not previously cited in a party’s brief, counsel must give written notice to the court and other counsel at least 48 hours before the oral argument. If unpublished or nonprecedential opinions are cited in a brief or other written submission, copies must be provided to any self-represented litigants, to counsel, or to the court only if specifically requested. Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991; amended eff. Sept. 20, 2017; amended eff. Jan. 4, 2021

Rule 5. Circulation of Opinions

When a draft opinion has been prepared, the authoring judge will circulate it to other members of the court for their information and comments.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991; amended eff. Oct. 7, 2010 Rule 6. Opinion Issuance

Except in extraordinary circumstances, opinions will be filed on Monday of each week. Counsel of record and unrepresented parties will receive notice if an opinion is to be filed in their case on Monday, so they can check the appellate courts’ website at the designated time.

The official publication of the Court of Appeals, for the purpose of notice to the public and the legal profession, is Minnesota Lawyer. Notices may be published elsewhere at the discretion of the Chief Judge.

After release, the panel may make clerical changes in an opinion at any time ex parte.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991; amended eff. Oct. 7, 2010; amended eff. July 18, 2016

Rule 7. Procedures After Decision

The Clerk of the Appellate Courts taxes costs and disbursements pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 139.03. After expiration of the 30-day period to petition for review, the Clerk of Appellate Courts will transmit the judgment to the trial court administrator and return the trial record.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991

Rule 8. Motion Procedure

The form, content, and time periods for motions are prescribed in Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 127.

Motions and requests for extraordinary remedies are disposed of by the Chief Judge or by a special term panel designated by the Chief Judge. Routine motions, including those seeking voluntary dismissal, postponements, or extensions of time to file briefs, are disposed of by the Chief Judge. Motions made after submission of a case will be referred to the panel to which the case is assigned.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991; amended eff. Oct. 7, 2010

Rule 9. Criminal Appeals

In all appeals taken under Minn. R. Crim. P. 28, a statement of the case shall be filed as prescribed by Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 133.03.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991 Rule 10. Recusal of Judges

Court of Appeals judges are subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct adopted by the Supreme Court. Counsel may request that a member of the panel assigned to a case recuse in accordance with Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 141.02. If a judge recuses, the Chief Judge names a replacement to the panel.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991; renumbered Oct. 1, 1999; eff. Oct. 1, 1999; amended eff. July 18, 2016

Rule 11. Amicus Briefs

Where the same attorney or law firm represents a party and a proposed amicus curiae, leave to file an additional brief as amicus curiae is not granted unless the amicus brief will represent a position not already before the court or unless the interests of justice require.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991; renumbered Oct. 1, 1999; eff. Oct. 1, 1999

Rule 12. Remand From the Supreme Court

When the Supreme Court remands a case to the Court of Appeals, the court may request additional briefing, direct that oral arguments be heard, or take other appropriate action.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991; renumbered Oct. 1, 1999; eff. Oct. 1, 1999

Rule 13. Full Court Meeting

The Chief Judge, subject to the authority of the Chief Justice, exercises general administrative authority over the court. All matters passed on by the bench shall be considered policy matters to be carried out and implemented by the Chief Judge.

The judges of the Court of Appeals meet periodically, at the call of the Chief Judge or a majority of the judges.

Adopted Oct. 25, 1991, eff. Oct. 25, 1991; renumbered Oct. 1, 1999; eff. Oct. 1, 1999; amended eff. Oct. 7, 2010; amended eff. July 18, 2016 Rule 14. [Renumbered Rule 13 Oct. 1, 1999, eff. Oct. 1, 1999]

APPENDIX

FORM PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

[Deleted Oct. 1, 1999, eff. Oct. 1, 1999.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.