U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 1946

Anderson v. Kenosha Auto Transp. Inc.

U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided November 7, 1946 · Donovan

6 F.R.D. 266; 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1614

Counsel

Meagher & Geer, of Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiffs., Freeman and King, of Minneapolis, Minn., and Hunt, Palmer & Hood, of Duluth, Minn., for defendant in support of said motion., Abbott, MacPherran, Dancer & Montague, and Harry C. Applequist, all of Duluth, Minn., for the said Hilmer Carlson, in opposition to said motion.

Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

The reasons for the ruling in this case are the same as set forth in the Memorandum in the case of Anderson v. Kenosha Auto Transport, Inc., 6 F.R.D. 265.

Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

The reasons for the ruling in this case are the same as set forth in the Memorandum in the case of Anderson v. Kenosha Auto Transport, Inc., 6 F.R.D. 265.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.