U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 1969

In re Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc.

In re Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc.
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided January 29, 1969 · Larson
299 F. Supp. 550 (Federal Supplement)

In re Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LARSON, District Judge.

The case of Associated Electronic Supply Co. of Omaha v. C. B. S. Electronic Sales Corp., 288 F.2d 683 (8 Cir. 1961), states that a counterclaim may not be asserted as a basis for the recovery of a judgment for damages against a petitioning creditor. See also, Schreffler v. Schreffler, 155 F.2d 221, 222,10 Cir., and decisions at United States v. Verrier, 179 F.Supp. 336 and In re Love B. Woods & Co., 222 F.Supp. 161.

ORDER

The motion to dismiss Shuron Continental, Division of Textron, Inc., as a petitioning creditor has been dismissed by the Alleged Bankrupt.

The motion of the Alleged Bankrupt to amend its Amended Answer to assert a counterclaim against petitioning creditor Shuron Continental, Division of Textron, Inc., is denied.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LARSON, District Judge.

The case of Associated Electronic Supply Co. of Omaha v. C. B. S. Electronic Sales Corp., 288 F.2d 683 (8 Cir. 1961), states that a counterclaim may not be asserted as a basis for the recovery of a judgment for damages against a petitioning creditor. See also, Schreffler v. Schreffler, 155 F.2d 221, 222,10 Cir., and decisions at United States v. Verrier, 179 F.Supp. 336 and In re Love B. Woods & Co., 222 F.Supp. 161.

ORDER

The motion to dismiss Shuron Continental, Division of Textron, Inc., as a petitioning creditor has been dismissed by the Alleged Bankrupt.

The motion of the Alleged Bankrupt to amend its Amended Answer to assert a counterclaim against petitioning creditor Shuron Continental, Division of Textron, Inc., is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.