Otterness v. Andersen Windows Corporation
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Einar J. Otterness, Case No. 17-cv-4767 (WMW/TNL)
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Andersen Windows Corporation; The Hartford, Old Republic Insurance Company, administered by Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.; and Menk & Menk Law Firm,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the June 6, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Dkt. 44.) No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews a Report and Recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the Report and Recommendation and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The June 6, 2018 Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 44), is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant Menk & Menk Law Firm’s motion to dismiss, (Dkt. 11), is GRANTED, and Defendant Menk & Menk Law Firm is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3. Defendant The Hartford is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on Plaintiff Einar J. Otterness’s failure to prosecute; and 4. Defendant Old Republic Insurance Company is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on Plaintiff Einar J. Otterness’s failure to prosecute.
Dated: August 2, 2018 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Einar J. Otterness, Case No. 17-cv-4767 (WMW/TNL)
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Andersen Windows Corporation; The Hartford, Old Republic Insurance Company, administered by Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.; and Menk & Menk Law Firm,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the June 6, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Dkt. 44.) No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews a Report and Recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the Report and Recommendation and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The June 6, 2018 Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 44), is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant Menk & Menk Law Firm’s motion to dismiss, (Dkt. 11), is GRANTED, and Defendant Menk & Menk Law Firm is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3. Defendant The Hartford is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on Plaintiff Einar J. Otterness’s failure to prosecute; and 4. Defendant Old Republic Insurance Company is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on Plaintiff Einar J. Otterness’s failure to prosecute.
Dated: August 2, 2018 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.