Lloyd v. Century Link
Lloyd v. Century Link
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jeffrey A. Lloyd, Case No. 18-cv-3077 (WMW/SER) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Century Link, Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the December 7, 2018 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. (Dkt. 3.)
Objections have not been filed in the time period permitted. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error. Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The December 7, 2018 R&R, (Dkt. 3), is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Lloyd’s complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Lloyd’s application to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs, (Dkt. 2), is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 16, 2019 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jeffrey A. Lloyd, Case No. 18-cv-3077 (WMW/SER) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Century Link, Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the December 7, 2018 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. (Dkt. 3.)
Objections have not been filed in the time period permitted. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error. Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The December 7, 2018 R&R, (Dkt. 3), is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Lloyd’s complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Lloyd’s application to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs, (Dkt. 2), is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 16, 2019 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.