Hausfeld v. Minnesota Department of Human Services
Hausfeld v. Minnesota Department of Human Services
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Brian Hausfeld, File No. 17-cv-4360 (ECT/KMM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the January 7, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. ECF No. 8. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] is ACCEPTED; 2. The Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 23, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Brian Hausfeld, File No. 17-cv-4360 (ECT/KMM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the January 7, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. ECF No. 8. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] is ACCEPTED; 2. The Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 23, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.