Sirleaf v. SSecretary Homeland Security
Sirleaf v. SSecretary Homeland Security
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Siaka S., Case No. 19-CV-00466 (SRN/BRT) P e t i t i o n er, v. ORDER Secretary of Homeland Security et al., Respondents.
Siaka S., pro se.
Ana H. Voss and Ann M. Bildtsen, United States Attorney’s Office, 300 South 4th Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for Respondents.
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge Petitioner, a lawful permanent resident of the United States who was convicted of an aggravated felony and subsequently ordered removed from this county, filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2241 [Doc. No. 1]. On March 5, 2019, Petitioner was removed to Liberia. (See Pryd Decl. & 6 [Doc. No. 5], Ex. 2 [Doc. No. 5- 2].)
Article III of the Constitution grants jurisdiction over cases and controversies. Ali v. Cangemi, 419 F.3d 722, 723 (8th Cir. 2005). If a subsequent development in a case results in a court’s inability to “grant effective relief, the case is considered moot.” Id. (citation omitted); see also Roberts v. Norris, 415 F.3d 816, 819 (8th Cir. 2005).
In the case of a petition for habeas corpus brought by an immigration detainee, once the petitioner “has been removed from the United States and deported to his native country . . . his petition seeking release from ICE custody becomes moot, as there is no longer a live case or controversy as required by Article III.” Estrada-Heredia v. Holder, No. 12-cv- 1157 (SRN/SER), 2012 WL 4839113, at *2 (D. Minn. Sept. 25, 2012) (citations omitted), adopted by 2012 WL 4839019 (D. Minn. Oct 11, 2012).
The Government has advised the Court that Petitioner has been removed from the United States. (See Pryd Decl. & 6 [Doc. No. 5], Ex. 2 [Doc. No. 5-2].) Because Petitioner has been deported from this country, “[t]his Court can no longer order the relief sought in the Petition.” Estrada-Heredia, 2012 WL 4839913, at *2. Accordingly, because there is no longer a justiciable case or controversy, the petition must be denied as moot.
Based on the foregoing, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc.
No. 1] is DENIED; and 2. This action is DISMISSED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: March 21, 2019 s/ Susan Richard Nelson SUSAN RICHARD NELSON United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Siaka S., Case No. 19-CV-00466 (SRN/BRT) P e t i t i o n er, v. ORDER Secretary of Homeland Security et al., Respondents.
Siaka S., pro se.
Ana H. Voss and Ann M. Bildtsen, United States Attorney’s Office, 300 South 4th Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for Respondents.
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge Petitioner, a lawful permanent resident of the United States who was convicted of an aggravated felony and subsequently ordered removed from this county, filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2241 [Doc. No. 1]. On March 5, 2019, Petitioner was removed to Liberia. (See Pryd Decl. & 6 [Doc. No. 5], Ex. 2 [Doc. No. 5- 2].)
Article III of the Constitution grants jurisdiction over cases and controversies. Ali v. Cangemi, 419 F.3d 722, 723 (8th Cir. 2005). If a subsequent development in a case results in a court’s inability to “grant effective relief, the case is considered moot.” Id. (citation omitted); see also Roberts v. Norris, 415 F.3d 816, 819 (8th Cir. 2005).
In the case of a petition for habeas corpus brought by an immigration detainee, once the petitioner “has been removed from the United States and deported to his native country . . . his petition seeking release from ICE custody becomes moot, as there is no longer a live case or controversy as required by Article III.” Estrada-Heredia v. Holder, No. 12-cv- 1157 (SRN/SER), 2012 WL 4839113, at *2 (D. Minn. Sept. 25, 2012) (citations omitted), adopted by 2012 WL 4839019 (D. Minn. Oct 11, 2012).
The Government has advised the Court that Petitioner has been removed from the United States. (See Pryd Decl. & 6 [Doc. No. 5], Ex. 2 [Doc. No. 5-2].) Because Petitioner has been deported from this country, “[t]his Court can no longer order the relief sought in the Petition.” Estrada-Heredia, 2012 WL 4839913, at *2. Accordingly, because there is no longer a justiciable case or controversy, the petition must be denied as moot.
Based on the foregoing, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc.
No. 1] is DENIED; and 2. This action is DISMISSED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: March 21, 2019 s/ Susan Richard Nelson SUSAN RICHARD NELSON United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.