Calhoun v. Washington County Community Services Child Support Unit
Calhoun v. Washington County Community Services Child Support Unit
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Rhome J. Calhoun, File No. 18-cv-01881 (ECT/HB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Washington County Community Services Child Support Unit, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the April 23, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. ECF No. 49. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 49] is ACCEPTED; 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 34] is GRANTED; and 3. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 10, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Rhome J. Calhoun, File No. 18-cv-01881 (ECT/HB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Washington County Community Services Child Support Unit, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the April 23, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. ECF No. 49. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 49] is ACCEPTED; 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 34] is GRANTED; and 3. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 10, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.