U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2019

Bishop v. Mesojedec

Bishop v. Mesojedec
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided July 9, 2019

Bishop v. Mesojedec

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Merel Evans Bishop, File No. 19-cv-00794 (ECT/KMM) Plaintiff, v. Chad Mesojedec, Karen Dalluge, Jessica ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Geil, Sandra L. Bryant, Nicole Smith, AND RECOMMENDATION Jordan Goodman, Ryan Hulke, Stacey Sonnek, and all members of the Spiritual Practices Advisory Committee (SPAC), in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the June 13, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. The Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Dated: July 9, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Merel Evans Bishop, File No. 19-cv-00794 (ECT/KMM) Plaintiff, v. Chad Mesojedec, Karen Dalluge, Jessica ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Geil, Sandra L. Bryant, Nicole Smith, AND RECOMMENDATION Jordan Goodman, Ryan Hulke, Stacey Sonnek, and all members of the Spiritual Practices Advisory Committee (SPAC), in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the June 13, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. The Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Dated: July 9, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.