Simonson v. Saul
Simonson v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Blake T.S., File No. 18-cv-1029 (ECT/BRT) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the June 19, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. ECF No. 22. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 22] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 14] is GRANTED IN PART; 3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 20] is DENIED; and 4. This matter is REMANDED under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 8, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Blake T.S., File No. 18-cv-1029 (ECT/BRT) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the June 19, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. ECF No. 22. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 22] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 14] is GRANTED IN PART; 3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 20] is DENIED; and 4. This matter is REMANDED under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 8, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.