Jenkins v. Ugene
Jenkins v. Ugene
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Ardell L. Jenkins, File No. 19-cv-1090 (ECT/SER) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Ugene, Scott, Ayana, and Anoka County Human Service Economic Assistance, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the June 11, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 3. Plaintiff Ardell L. Jenkins’ Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees of Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 1, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Ardell L. Jenkins, File No. 19-cv-1090 (ECT/SER) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Ugene, Scott, Ayana, and Anoka County Human Service Economic Assistance, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the June 11, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 3. Plaintiff Ardell L. Jenkins’ Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees of Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 1, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.