Jackson v. Mend Correctional Care
Jackson v. Mend Correctional Care
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Larry Dion Jackson, File No. 19-cv-01226 (ECT/SER) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Mend Correctional Care, Nurse Martha Denzer, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the June 17, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. ECF No. 6. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ACCEPTED; 2. The Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and 3. Plaintiff Larry Dion Jackson’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED as MOOT.
Dated: July 12, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Larry Dion Jackson, File No. 19-cv-01226 (ECT/SER) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Mend Correctional Care, Nurse Martha Denzer, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the June 17, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. ECF No. 6. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ACCEPTED; 2. The Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and 3. Plaintiff Larry Dion Jackson’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED as MOOT.
Dated: July 12, 2019 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.