Olery v. DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel
Olery v. DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Gael A. O., Case No. 18-cv-3269 (WMW/TNL) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel, Respondent.
This matter is before the Court on the May 13, 2019 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Dkt. 15.) Objections to the R&R have not been filed in the time period permitted. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 amendment (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The May 13, 2019 R&R, (Dkt. 15), is ADOPTED.
2. Petitioner Gael A. O.’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is DENIED; and 3. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 24, 2019 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Gael A. O., Case No. 18-cv-3269 (WMW/TNL) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel, Respondent.
This matter is before the Court on the May 13, 2019 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Dkt. 15.) Objections to the R&R have not been filed in the time period permitted. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 amendment (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The May 13, 2019 R&R, (Dkt. 15), is ADOPTED.
2. Petitioner Gael A. O.’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is DENIED; and 3. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 24, 2019 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.