Bielen v. Rochester Police Dept.
Bielen v. Rochester Police Dept.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Kathleen A. Bielen, Case No. 19-cv-0872 (WMW/HB) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Rochester Police Dept., et al.
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the October 28, 2019 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Dkt. 35.)
Because no objection to the R&R has been filed, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R, the foregoing analysis, and all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The October 28, 2019 R&R, (Dkt. 35), is ADOPTED.
2. The matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
3. The Defendants’ motions to dismiss, (Dkts. 7, 13), are DENIED AS MOOT.1 In light of the Court’s ruling on the October 28, 2019 R&R, the August 22, 2019 R&R, (Dkt. 31), also is moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: December 10, 2019 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Kathleen A. Bielen, Case No. 19-cv-0872 (WMW/HB) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Rochester Police Dept., et al.
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the October 28, 2019 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Dkt. 35.)
Because no objection to the R&R has been filed, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R, the foregoing analysis, and all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The October 28, 2019 R&R, (Dkt. 35), is ADOPTED.
2. The matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
3. The Defendants’ motions to dismiss, (Dkts. 7, 13), are DENIED AS MOOT.1 In light of the Court’s ruling on the October 28, 2019 R&R, the August 22, 2019 R&R, (Dkt. 31), also is moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: December 10, 2019 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.