Muhammad v. United States (FTCA)
Muhammad v. United States (FTCA)
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, File No. 19-cv-1750 (ECT/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER United States (FTCA), Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the January 9, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. ECF No. 12. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 12] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to pay the filing fee [ECF No. 11] is DENIED; and 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Dated: January 28, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, File No. 19-cv-1750 (ECT/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER United States (FTCA), Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the January 9, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. ECF No. 12. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 12] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to pay the filing fee [ECF No. 11] is DENIED; and 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Dated: January 28, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.