Van Zyverden v. Marques
Van Zyverden v. Marques
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Corstiaan Aaron Van Zyverden, File No. 19-cv-948 (ECT/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. Marques, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the January 8, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. ECF No. 9. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 9] is ACCEPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED AS MOOT.
Dated: January 28, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Corstiaan Aaron Van Zyverden, File No. 19-cv-948 (ECT/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. Marques, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the January 8, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. ECF No. 9. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 9] is ACCEPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED AS MOOT.
Dated: January 28, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.