U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2020

Flah v. Bureau of Customs and Immigration Enforcement

Flah v. Bureau of Customs and Immigration Enforcement
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided March 4, 2020

Flah v. Bureau of Customs and Immigration Enforcement

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Kawo O. F., File No. 19-cv-2311 (ECT/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Bureau of Customs and Immigration Enforcement, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the February 10, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. ECF No. 18. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 18] is ACCEPTED; 2. Petitioner Kawo O.F.’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED AS MOOT; and 3. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: March 4, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Kawo O. F., File No. 19-cv-2311 (ECT/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Bureau of Customs and Immigration Enforcement, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the February 10, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. ECF No. 18. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 18] is ACCEPTED; 2. Petitioner Kawo O.F.’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED AS MOOT; and 3. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: March 4, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.