U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2020

Embaye v. Minneapolis Police Department

Embaye v. Minneapolis Police Department
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided March 27, 2020

Embaye v. Minneapolis Police Department

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Abraham Embaye, File No. 19-cv-2794 (ECT/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Elizabeth Scoggin, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on January 30, 2020. ECF No. 6. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and 3. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT.

Dated: March 27, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Abraham Embaye, File No. 19-cv-2794 (ECT/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Elizabeth Scoggin, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on January 30, 2020. ECF No. 6. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and 3. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT.

Dated: March 27, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.