Quinn v. Department of Justice
Quinn v. Department of Justice
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Andrew Quinn, File No. 20-cv-563 (ECT/ECW) Plaintiff, v. Department of Justice, Civil Rights ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Division; Justice Department Office of Civil AND RECOMMENDATION Rights; Minneapolis Police Department; St. Paul Police Department; Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office; Ramsey County Government; Catholic Charities; Verizon Wireless; St. Paul Public Library; Department of Human Services State of Minnesota; and Metro Transit Police Department, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the March 18, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 3. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: April 8, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Andrew Quinn, File No. 20-cv-563 (ECT/ECW) Plaintiff, v. Department of Justice, Civil Rights ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Division; Justice Department Office of Civil AND RECOMMENDATION Rights; Minneapolis Police Department; St. Paul Police Department; Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office; Ramsey County Government; Catholic Charities; Verizon Wireless; St. Paul Public Library; Department of Human Services State of Minnesota; and Metro Transit Police Department, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the March 18, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 3. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: April 8, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.