Rannow v. McLeod County Court
Rannow v. McLeod County Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Steven Rannow, File No. 19-cv-2745 (ECT/BRT) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION McLeod County Court and McLeod County Social Services, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson issued a Report and Recommendation on March 23, 2020. ECF No. 10. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 10] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); 3. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT; and 4. Plaintiff’s Motion [ECF No. 8] is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: April 15, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Steven Rannow, File No. 19-cv-2745 (ECT/BRT) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION McLeod County Court and McLeod County Social Services, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson issued a Report and Recommendation on March 23, 2020. ECF No. 10. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 10] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); 3. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT; and 4. Plaintiff’s Motion [ECF No. 8] is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: April 15, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.