U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2020

Thoresen v. Titus

Thoresen v. Titus
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided April 24, 2020

Thoresen v. Titus

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Joseph Christian Thoresen, File No. 20-cv-769 (ECT/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Jeff Titus, Warden of Oak Park Heights Correctional Institution, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the March 26, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. Petitioner’s Motion for an Extension [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and 3. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: April 24, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Joseph Christian Thoresen, File No. 20-cv-769 (ECT/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Jeff Titus, Warden of Oak Park Heights Correctional Institution, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the March 26, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. Petitioner’s Motion for an Extension [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and 3. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: April 24, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.