U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2020

White v. Vanderbeek

White v. Vanderbeek
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided June 2, 2020

White v. Vanderbeek

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Albert White, File No. 18-cv-3424 (ECT/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Diana Vanderbeek, Janell Hussain, R.N.

B.Z., R.N. D.M., R.N. A.K., and R.N. A.D., HT, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on April 24, 2020. ECF No. 41. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 41] is ACCEPTED; 2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 31] is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: June 2, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Albert White, File No. 18-cv-3424 (ECT/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Diana Vanderbeek, Janell Hussain, R.N.

B.Z., R.N. D.M., R.N. A.K., and R.N. A.D., HT, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on April 24, 2020. ECF No. 41. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 41] is ACCEPTED; 2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 31] is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: June 2, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.