Stolp v. Saul
Stolp v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Daniel E. S., Case No. 18-cv-3069 MJD/ECW Plaintiff, v. ORDER Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright dated June 1, 2020, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Dkt. 24) is GRANTED and Plaintiff is AWARDED $3,675.00 for reasonable attorney’s fees under the EAJA.
2. In accordance with the EAJA and Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the EAJA award is payable to Plaintiff as the litigant and subject to offset to satisfy any pre- existing debts that the litigant may owe to the United States.
DATED: June 25, 2020 s/ Michael J. Davis MICHAEL J. DAVIS United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Daniel E. S., Case No. 18-cv-3069 MJD/ECW Plaintiff, v. ORDER Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright dated June 1, 2020, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Dkt. 24) is GRANTED and Plaintiff is AWARDED $3,675.00 for reasonable attorney’s fees under the EAJA.
2. In accordance with the EAJA and Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the EAJA award is payable to Plaintiff as the litigant and subject to offset to satisfy any pre- existing debts that the litigant may owe to the United States.
DATED: June 25, 2020 s/ Michael J. Davis MICHAEL J. DAVIS United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.