Puchalski v. McLellan
Puchalski v. McLellan
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jacob Hugo Puchalski, File No. 20-cv-973 (ECT/TNL) Petitioner, v. Jacob D. McLellan, District Supervisor; ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT D.O.C.; Judge Kathleen A. Mottl; AND RECOMMENDATION Elizabeth M. Larson, Prosecuting Attorney; Richard R. Hermes, Public Defender; Ryan Busch, Probation Officer; and Wright County Employees, Respondents. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the June 15, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. ECF No. 8. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] is ACCEPTED; 2. Petitioner Jacob Hugo Puchalski’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] and related Motion [ECF No. 3] are DENIED AS MOOT; 3. Petitioner’s Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT; and 4. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 6, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jacob Hugo Puchalski, File No. 20-cv-973 (ECT/TNL) Petitioner, v. Jacob D. McLellan, District Supervisor; ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT D.O.C.; Judge Kathleen A. Mottl; AND RECOMMENDATION Elizabeth M. Larson, Prosecuting Attorney; Richard R. Hermes, Public Defender; Ryan Busch, Probation Officer; and Wright County Employees, Respondents. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the June 15, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. ECF No. 8. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] is ACCEPTED; 2. Petitioner Jacob Hugo Puchalski’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] and related Motion [ECF No. 3] are DENIED AS MOOT; 3. Petitioner’s Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT; and 4. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 6, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.