Carlson v. Schnell
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Joshua Jon Carlson, Case No. 20-cv-1676 (WMW/HB) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Paul Schnell et al., Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the August 18, 2020 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Dkt. 12.)
Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the R&R for clear error.1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The August 18, 2020 Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 12), is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff Joshua Jon Carlson’s motion for a temporary restraining order, (Dkt. 9), is DENIED.
1 Carlson filed a document labeled on the docket as “Response (Objection) to Report and Recommendation” after Magistrate Judge Bowbeer issued the R&R. However, despite the title of Carlson’s filing, Carlson does not discuss any objections to the R&R. Therefore, the Court finds that no objections have been made to the R&R. Dated: November 10, 2020 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Joshua Jon Carlson, Case No. 20-cv-1676 (WMW/HB) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Paul Schnell et al., Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the August 18, 2020 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Dkt. 12.)
Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the R&R for clear error.1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The August 18, 2020 Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 12), is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff Joshua Jon Carlson’s motion for a temporary restraining order, (Dkt. 9), is DENIED.
1 Carlson filed a document labeled on the docket as “Response (Objection) to Report and Recommendation” after Magistrate Judge Bowbeer issued the R&R. However, despite the title of Carlson’s filing, Carlson does not discuss any objections to the R&R. Therefore, the Court finds that no objections have been made to the R&R. Dated: November 10, 2020 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.