U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2020

Quinn v. Justice Department Office of Civil Right

Quinn v. Justice Department Office of Civil Right
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided December 21, 2020

Quinn v. Justice Department Office of Civil Right

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Andrew Quinn, Case No. 20-cv-1774 (WMW/HB) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Department of Justice Civil Rights Div., Justice Department Office of Civil Rights and Regions Hospital, Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the September 11, 2020 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Dkt. 6.)

Because there were no timely objections to the R&R, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having carefully performed this review, the Court finds no clear error.

ORDER Based on the R&R, the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The September 11, 2020 R&R, (Dkt. 6), is ADOPTED.

2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.

3. The application to proceed in forma pauperis of Plaintiff Andrew Quinn, (Dkt. 2), is DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGEMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: December 21, 2020 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Andrew Quinn, Case No. 20-cv-1774 (WMW/HB) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Department of Justice Civil Rights Div., Justice Department Office of Civil Rights and Regions Hospital, Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the September 11, 2020 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Dkt. 6.)

Because there were no timely objections to the R&R, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having carefully performed this review, the Court finds no clear error.

ORDER Based on the R&R, the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The September 11, 2020 R&R, (Dkt. 6), is ADOPTED.

2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.

3. The application to proceed in forma pauperis of Plaintiff Andrew Quinn, (Dkt. 2), is DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGEMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: December 21, 2020 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.