Henry v. Saul
Henry v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Linda S. H., Case No. 19-cv-1863 (TNL) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
Edward C. Olson, 331 2nd Avenue South, Suite 420, Minneapolis, MN 55401 (for Plaintiff); and Elvi D. Jenkins, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Social Security Administration, 1301 Young Street, Mailroom 104, Dallas, TX, 75202 (for Defendant).
I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Linda S. H.’s Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (ECF No. 27.) For the reasons that follow, the Court grants this motion.
II. DISCUSSION Plaintiff initiated an action for judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of her disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Cross motions for summary judgment were subsequently filed by Plaintiff and the Commissioner. (ECF Nos. 15, 17.) On July 27, 2020, the Court issued an Order granting Plaintiff’s motion, denying the Commissioner’s motion, and remanding the matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff then filed the instant motion.
Under the EAJA, “a party who prevails in a civil action against the United States— including a lawsuit seeking judicial review of administrative action—shall be awarded fees and expenses ‘unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.’” Rapp v. Colvin, No. 12-cv- 2473 (PJS/TNL), 2014 WL 5461889, at *1 (D. Minn. Oct. 27, 2014) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)). In her present motion, Plaintiff seeks $7,113.76 in attorney fees for 34.6 hours of work. (ECF No. 28 at 5; see also Itemization of Legal Servs. at 1-2, Ex. A to Pl.’s Memo. in Supp. of Pl.’s Mot., ECF Nos. 28-1 & 29.) The Commissioner does not object to Plaintiff’s motion. (See ECF No. 31.) The Court finds that Plaintiff’s request is reasonable and fair.
III. ORDER Based on the record, memoranda, proceedings herein, and no objections to the requested amounts, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff be awarded $7,113.76 in reasonable attorney fees, subject to offset by any preexisting debt that Plaintiff owes to the United States.
Dated: December 28 , 2020 s/Tony N. Leung Tony N. Leung United States Magistrate Judge District of Minnesota Linda S. H. v. Saul Case No. 19-cv-1863 (TNL)
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Linda S. H., Case No. 19-cv-1863 (TNL) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
Edward C. Olson, 331 2nd Avenue South, Suite 420, Minneapolis, MN 55401 (for Plaintiff); and Elvi D. Jenkins, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Social Security Administration, 1301 Young Street, Mailroom 104, Dallas, TX, 75202 (for Defendant).
I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Linda S. H.’s Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (ECF No. 27.) For the reasons that follow, the Court grants this motion.
II. DISCUSSION Plaintiff initiated an action for judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of her disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Cross motions for summary judgment were subsequently filed by Plaintiff and the Commissioner. (ECF Nos. 15, 17.) On July 27, 2020, the Court issued an Order granting Plaintiff’s motion, denying the Commissioner’s motion, and remanding the matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff then filed the instant motion.
Under the EAJA, “a party who prevails in a civil action against the United States— including a lawsuit seeking judicial review of administrative action—shall be awarded fees and expenses ‘unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.’” Rapp v. Colvin, No. 12-cv- 2473 (PJS/TNL), 2014 WL 5461889, at *1 (D. Minn. Oct. 27, 2014) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)). In her present motion, Plaintiff seeks $7,113.76 in attorney fees for 34.6 hours of work. (ECF No. 28 at 5; see also Itemization of Legal Servs. at 1-2, Ex. A to Pl.’s Memo. in Supp. of Pl.’s Mot., ECF Nos. 28-1 & 29.) The Commissioner does not object to Plaintiff’s motion. (See ECF No. 31.) The Court finds that Plaintiff’s request is reasonable and fair.
III. ORDER Based on the record, memoranda, proceedings herein, and no objections to the requested amounts, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff be awarded $7,113.76 in reasonable attorney fees, subject to offset by any preexisting debt that Plaintiff owes to the United States.
Dated: December 28 , 2020 s/Tony N. Leung Tony N. Leung United States Magistrate Judge District of Minnesota Linda S. H. v. Saul Case No. 19-cv-1863 (TNL)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.