U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2020

Washington v. United States, The

Washington v. United States, The
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided December 28, 2020

Washington v. United States, The

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Robert William Washington, File No. 20-cv-1905 (ECT/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER The United States, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation on December 2, 2020. ECF No. 3. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ACCEPTED; 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; and 3. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY Dated: December 28, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Robert William Washington, File No. 20-cv-1905 (ECT/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER The United States, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation on December 2, 2020. ECF No. 3. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ACCEPTED; 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; and 3. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY Dated: December 28, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.