Charon v. US Drug Enforcement Administration
Charon v. US Drug Enforcement Administration
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jack Charon, File No. 20-cv-2112 (ECT/HB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer issued a Report and Recommendation on December 17, 2020. ECF No. 6. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ACCEPTED; 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and 3. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 8, 2021 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jack Charon, File No. 20-cv-2112 (ECT/HB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer issued a Report and Recommendation on December 17, 2020. ECF No. 6. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ACCEPTED; 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and 3. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 8, 2021 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.