McDaniel v. Saul
McDaniel v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Elizabeth A. M., Case No. 19-cv-3073 (WMW/BRT) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the December 14, 2020 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (Dkt. 16.)
No objections were filed. In the absence of objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The December 14, 2020 R&R, (Dkt. 16), is ADOPTED.
2. Defendant Andrew Saul’s motion for summary judgement, (Dkt. 14), is DENIED.
3. Plaintiff Elizabeth A. M.’s motion for summary judgement, (Dkt. 12), is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that Plaintiff seeks remand for further proceedings.
4. This case is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 17, 2021 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Elizabeth A. M., Case No. 19-cv-3073 (WMW/BRT) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the December 14, 2020 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (Dkt. 16.)
No objections were filed. In the absence of objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The December 14, 2020 R&R, (Dkt. 16), is ADOPTED.
2. Defendant Andrew Saul’s motion for summary judgement, (Dkt. 14), is DENIED.
3. Plaintiff Elizabeth A. M.’s motion for summary judgement, (Dkt. 12), is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that Plaintiff seeks remand for further proceedings.
4. This case is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 17, 2021 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.