U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2021

Mann v. State of Minnesota

Mann v. State of Minnesota
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided March 5, 2021

Mann v. State of Minnesota

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Terrance Mann, File No. 21-cv-245 (ECT/BRT) Petitioner, v. ORDER State of Minnesota, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson issued a Report and Recommendation on February 2, 2021. ECF No. 3. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ACCEPTED.

2. Petitioner’s motion to extend the time in which to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED.

3. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: March 5, 2021 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Terrance Mann, File No. 21-cv-245 (ECT/BRT) Petitioner, v. ORDER State of Minnesota, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson issued a Report and Recommendation on February 2, 2021. ECF No. 3. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ACCEPTED.

2. Petitioner’s motion to extend the time in which to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED.

3. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: March 5, 2021 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.