Laughlin v. Stuart
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Malik Laughlin; Kenneth Lewis; and File No. 19-cv-2547 (ECT/TNL) Michael Hari, Plaintiffs, v. James Stuart, Sheriff of Anoka County; ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Jonathon Evans, Deputy Sheriff of Anoka AND RECOMMENDATION County; Lt. Sheila Larson, Deputy Sheriff of Anoka County; Sgt. Carrie Wood, Deputy Sheriff of Anoka County; Tessa Villergas, Anoka County Deputy Sheriff; and Jesse Rasmussen, Anoka County Deputy Sheriff, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on May 12, 2021. ECF No. 348. No Party has objected to that R&R, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 348] is ACCEPTED; and 2. The Motion for Injunction Relief [ECF No. 288] is DENIED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: June 9, 2021 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Malik Laughlin; Kenneth Lewis; and File No. 19-cv-2547 (ECT/TNL) Michael Hari, Plaintiffs, v. James Stuart, Sheriff of Anoka County; ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Jonathon Evans, Deputy Sheriff of Anoka AND RECOMMENDATION County; Lt. Sheila Larson, Deputy Sheriff of Anoka County; Sgt. Carrie Wood, Deputy Sheriff of Anoka County; Tessa Villergas, Anoka County Deputy Sheriff; and Jesse Rasmussen, Anoka County Deputy Sheriff, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on May 12, 2021. ECF No. 348. No Party has objected to that R&R, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 348] is ACCEPTED; and 2. The Motion for Injunction Relief [ECF No. 288] is DENIED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: June 9, 2021 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.