Nur v. Olmsted County
Nur v. Olmsted County
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Kaiser Faisal Nur, Case No. 19-cv-2384 (WMW/DTS) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Olmsted County et al., Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the August 26, 2021 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of the United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Dkt. 73.) The R&R recommends granting in part and denying in part Defendants Stella Essien, Elizabeth Schneider-Loberg and MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC’s motion for summary judgment and granting Defendant Olmsted County’s motion for summary judgment. Objections to the R&R have not been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R, the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The August 26, 2021 R&R, (Dkt. 73), is ADOPTED.
2. Defendants Stella Essien, Elizabeth Schneider-Loberg and MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. 58) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: a. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment deliberate-indifference claims against Essien and Schneider-Loberg; and b. The motion is GRANTED in all other respects.
3. Defendant Olmsted County’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. 65), is GRANTED.
Dated: September 28, 2021 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Kaiser Faisal Nur, Case No. 19-cv-2384 (WMW/DTS) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Olmsted County et al., Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the August 26, 2021 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of the United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Dkt. 73.) The R&R recommends granting in part and denying in part Defendants Stella Essien, Elizabeth Schneider-Loberg and MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC’s motion for summary judgment and granting Defendant Olmsted County’s motion for summary judgment. Objections to the R&R have not been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R, the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The August 26, 2021 R&R, (Dkt. 73), is ADOPTED.
2. Defendants Stella Essien, Elizabeth Schneider-Loberg and MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. 58) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: a. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment deliberate-indifference claims against Essien and Schneider-Loberg; and b. The motion is GRANTED in all other respects.
3. Defendant Olmsted County’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. 65), is GRANTED.
Dated: September 28, 2021 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.