U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2021

Nur v. Olmsted County

Nur v. Olmsted County
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided September 28, 2021 · No. 0:19-cv-02384
Nur v. Olmsted County

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Kaiser Faisal Nur, Case No. 19-cv-2384 (WMW/DTS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION

Olmsted County et al.,

Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the August 26, 2021 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of the United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Dkt. 73.) The R&R recommends granting in part and denying in part Defendants Stella Essien, Elizabeth Schneider-Loberg and MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC’s motion for summary judgment and granting Defendant Olmsted County’s motion for summary judgment. Objections to the R&R have not been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

Based on the R&R, the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The August 26, 2021 R&R, (Dkt. 73), is ADOPTED.

2. Defendants Stella Essien, Elizabeth Schneider-Loberg and MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. 58) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

a. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s Fourteenth

Amendment deliberate-indifference claims against Essien and Schneider-Loberg; and

b. The motion is GRANTED in all other respects.

3. Defendant Olmsted County’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. 65), is GRANTED.

Dated: September 28, 2021 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright

Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.