Nur v. Olmsted County
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Kaiser Faisal Nur, Case No. 19-cv-2384 (WMW/DTS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
v. RECOMMENDATION
Olmsted County et al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the August 26, 2021 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of the United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Dkt. 73.) The R&R recommends granting in part and denying in part Defendants Stella Essien, Elizabeth Schneider-Loberg and MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC’s motion for summary judgment and granting Defendant Olmsted County’s motion for summary judgment. Objections to the R&R have not been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R, the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The August 26, 2021 R&R, (Dkt. 73), is ADOPTED.
2. Defendants Stella Essien, Elizabeth Schneider-Loberg and MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. 58) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
a. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s Fourteenth
Amendment deliberate-indifference claims against Essien and Schneider-Loberg; and
b. The motion is GRANTED in all other respects.
3. Defendant Olmsted County’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. 65), is GRANTED.
Dated: September 28, 2021 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright
Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.