U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2021

Reese v. Sherburne County Detention Center

Reese v. Sherburne County Detention Center
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided October 20, 2021

Reese v. Sherburne County Detention Center

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Dontay Lavarice Reese, File No. 19-cv-1975 (ECT/KMM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Sherburne County Detention Center, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez issued a Report and Recommendation on September 14, 2021. ECF No. 145. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 145] is ACCEPTED.

2. The MEnD Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 98] is GRANTED.

3. The Sherburne County Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 107] is GRANTED.

4. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: October 20, 2021 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Dontay Lavarice Reese, File No. 19-cv-1975 (ECT/KMM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Sherburne County Detention Center, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez issued a Report and Recommendation on September 14, 2021. ECF No. 145. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 145] is ACCEPTED.

2. The MEnD Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 98] is GRANTED.

3. The Sherburne County Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 107] is GRANTED.

4. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: October 20, 2021 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.