U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2022

Vogt v. MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC

Vogt v. MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided January 4, 2022

Vogt v. MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Molly Vogt, Case No. 21-cv-1055 (WMW/TNL) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Crow Wing County et al., Defendants.

Before the Court is the November 1, 2021 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of then-United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (Dkt. 32.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The November 1, 2021 R&R, (Dkt. 32), is ADOPTED.

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, (Dkt. 15), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: a. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Counts II–V; b. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to all counts against Defendants Heath Fosteson, Cherokee DeLeon, Christine Ghinter, and Lukasz Organista; and c. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Count I against Defendants Robert Anderson, Raynor Blum, and Ronald J. Imgrund.

Dated: January 4, 2022 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Molly Vogt, Case No. 21-cv-1055 (WMW/TNL) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Crow Wing County et al., Defendants.

Before the Court is the November 1, 2021 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of then-United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (Dkt. 32.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The November 1, 2021 R&R, (Dkt. 32), is ADOPTED.

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, (Dkt. 15), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: a. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Counts II–V; b. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to all counts against Defendants Heath Fosteson, Cherokee DeLeon, Christine Ghinter, and Lukasz Organista; and c. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Count I against Defendants Robert Anderson, Raynor Blum, and Ronald J. Imgrund.

Dated: January 4, 2022 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.