Kellum v. Kallis
Kellum v. Kallis
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
James Nathan Kellum, Case No. 21-CV-1664 (KMM/LIB) Petitioner, v. ORDER Warden Steve Kallis, Respondent.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated January 31, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, No. 19- cv-2384 (WMW/DTS), 2021 WL 4444813, at *1 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court’s careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.
Date: March 22, 2022 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
James Nathan Kellum, Case No. 21-CV-1664 (KMM/LIB) Petitioner, v. ORDER Warden Steve Kallis, Respondent.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated January 31, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, No. 19- cv-2384 (WMW/DTS), 2021 WL 4444813, at *1 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court’s careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.
Date: March 22, 2022 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.