Sims v. Jahnke
Sims v. Jahnke
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dustin R. Sims, No. 21-cv-2527 (KMM/BRT) Plaintiff, v. Dan Jahnke, Douglas County Sheriff ORDER Deputy; Amy Anderson; Cindy Kuhnau; Unknown Sgt.; Deputy Tanner; and Deputy Nichole; Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson, dated February 24, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Dorsey & Whitney LLP v. United States Postal Serv., 402 F. Supp. 3d 598, 604–05 (D. Minn. 2019) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to U.S.C. § 1915A(b).
2. The application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 6] is DENIED.
Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.
Date: April 12, 2022 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dustin R. Sims, No. 21-cv-2527 (KMM/BRT) Plaintiff, v. Dan Jahnke, Douglas County Sheriff ORDER Deputy; Amy Anderson; Cindy Kuhnau; Unknown Sgt.; Deputy Tanner; and Deputy Nichole; Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson, dated February 24, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Dorsey & Whitney LLP v. United States Postal Serv., 402 F. Supp. 3d 598, 604–05 (D. Minn. 2019) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to U.S.C. § 1915A(b).
2. The application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 6] is DENIED.
Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.
Date: April 12, 2022 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.