Mays v. Sherburne County Jail
Mays v. Sherburne County Jail
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Otis Mays, Sienemah Gaye, Case No. 21-cv-2078 (WMW/LIB) M. Montgomery, Marlon M. Windborn, Tyice Phillips, Justin Lindsey, and Clifton Walker, Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. Sherburne County Jail, Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on three Reports and Recommendations (R&Rs) by United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated November 30, 2021; January 14, 2022; and February 25, 2022. (Dkts. 15, 22, 24.) Because no timely objections to the R&Rs have been filed, the Court reviews the R&Rs for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&Rs, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&Rs, the foregoing analysis, and all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The November 30, 2021 R&R, (Dkt. 15), is ADOPTED.
2. The January 14, 2022 R&R, (Dkt. 22), is ADOPTED.
3. The February 25, 2022 R&R, (Dkt. 24), is ADOPTED.
4. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., for failure to prosecute.
5. Plaintiffs’ applications to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkts. 11, 12, 13, and 14), are DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: April 26, 2022 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Otis Mays, Sienemah Gaye, Case No. 21-cv-2078 (WMW/LIB) M. Montgomery, Marlon M. Windborn, Tyice Phillips, Justin Lindsey, and Clifton Walker, Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. Sherburne County Jail, Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on three Reports and Recommendations (R&Rs) by United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated November 30, 2021; January 14, 2022; and February 25, 2022. (Dkts. 15, 22, 24.) Because no timely objections to the R&Rs have been filed, the Court reviews the R&Rs for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&Rs, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&Rs, the foregoing analysis, and all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The November 30, 2021 R&R, (Dkt. 15), is ADOPTED.
2. The January 14, 2022 R&R, (Dkt. 22), is ADOPTED.
3. The February 25, 2022 R&R, (Dkt. 24), is ADOPTED.
4. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., for failure to prosecute.
5. Plaintiffs’ applications to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkts. 11, 12, 13, and 14), are DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: April 26, 2022 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.