Broussard v. United States of America
Broussard v. United States of America
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Aaron Rhy Broussard, Case No. 22-cv-1239 (WMW/LIB) Petitioner, ORDER v. United States of America; Sheriff Joel L.
Brott; Sherburne County Jail; Terrence Olstad; Thomas M. Hollenhorst; Melinda A. Williams; Charles J. Novats, Jr.; U.S. Department of Justice; and U.S. Marshal Service, Respondents.
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Aaron Rhy Broussard’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1); application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkt. 2); motion for a temporary restraining order, (Dkt. 5); and motion for a temporary injunction, (Dkt. 6).
Based on the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Petitioner Aaron Rhy Broussard’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED as frivolous.1 In the past two months, Broussard has filed nearly two dozen frivolous lawsuits.
See, e.g., Broussard v. United States, No. 22-cv-0890 (PJS/BRT), Dkt. 8 (D. Minn. Apr.
13, 2022). For the reasons set forth in Broussard v. United States, No. 21-CV-2484 (SRN/LIB), 2021 WL 5868719, at *1–2 (D. Minn. Nov. 18, 2021), and Broussard v. United States, No. 22-CV-0889 (JRT/LIB), Dkt. 8 (D. Minn. Apr. 12, 2022), the Court also concludes that this case is frivolous.
2. Petitioner Aaron Rhy Broussard’s application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs, (Dkt. 2), motion for a temporary restraining order, (Dkt. 5), and motion for a temporary injunction, (Dkt. 6), are DENIED.
3. It is certified that an appeal from the dismissal of this matter cannot be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 13, 2022 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Aaron Rhy Broussard, Case No. 22-cv-1239 (WMW/LIB) Petitioner, ORDER v. United States of America; Sheriff Joel L.
Brott; Sherburne County Jail; Terrence Olstad; Thomas M. Hollenhorst; Melinda A. Williams; Charles J. Novats, Jr.; U.S. Department of Justice; and U.S. Marshal Service, Respondents.
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Aaron Rhy Broussard’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1); application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkt. 2); motion for a temporary restraining order, (Dkt. 5); and motion for a temporary injunction, (Dkt. 6).
Based on the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Petitioner Aaron Rhy Broussard’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED as frivolous.1 In the past two months, Broussard has filed nearly two dozen frivolous lawsuits.
See, e.g., Broussard v. United States, No. 22-cv-0890 (PJS/BRT), Dkt. 8 (D. Minn. Apr.
13, 2022). For the reasons set forth in Broussard v. United States, No. 21-CV-2484 (SRN/LIB), 2021 WL 5868719, at *1–2 (D. Minn. Nov. 18, 2021), and Broussard v. United States, No. 22-CV-0889 (JRT/LIB), Dkt. 8 (D. Minn. Apr. 12, 2022), the Court also concludes that this case is frivolous.
2. Petitioner Aaron Rhy Broussard’s application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs, (Dkt. 2), motion for a temporary restraining order, (Dkt. 5), and motion for a temporary injunction, (Dkt. 6), are DENIED.
3. It is certified that an appeal from the dismissal of this matter cannot be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 13, 2022 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.