Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2022

Graham v. National Web Design LLC

Graham v. National Web Design LLC
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided June 22, 2022

Graham v. National Web Design LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Chester C. Graham, No. 20-cv-1575 (KMM/BRT) Plaintiff, ORDER v. National Web Design LLC, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson, dated May 27, 2022. [ECF No. 21]. The R&R recommends that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff Chester C. Graham has not filed any objections to the R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court’s careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R [ECF No. 21] is ACCEPTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: June 22, 2022 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Chester C. Graham, No. 20-cv-1575 (KMM/BRT) Plaintiff, ORDER v. National Web Design LLC, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson, dated May 27, 2022. [ECF No. 21]. The R&R recommends that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff Chester C. Graham has not filed any objections to the R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court’s careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R [ECF No. 21] is ACCEPTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: June 22, 2022 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑