Aery v. Anderson
Aery v. Anderson
Trial Court Opinion
UNITDEISDT SRTIACTT EOSF D MISINTRNIECSTO CTOAU RT James Paul Aery, Case No. 22-cv-1158 (WMW/JFD) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Lee Anderson, Katherine Obryan, and Beltrami County, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the June 7, 2022 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Dkt. 5.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews a R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The June 7, 2022 R&R, (Dkt. 5), is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff James Paul Aery’s complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. Plaintiff James Paul Aery’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkt. 4), is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 12, 2022 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITDEISDT SRTIACTT EOSF D MISINTRNIECSTO CTOAU RT James Paul Aery, Case No. 22-cv-1158 (WMW/JFD) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Lee Anderson, Katherine Obryan, and Beltrami County, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the June 7, 2022 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Dkt. 5.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews a R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The June 7, 2022 R&R, (Dkt. 5), is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff James Paul Aery’s complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. Plaintiff James Paul Aery’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkt. 4), is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 12, 2022 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.