Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2022

Johnson v. Ramsey County ADC

Johnson v. Ramsey County ADC
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided July 27, 2022

Johnson v. Ramsey County ADC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Eugene Laron Johnson, No. 22-CV-1123 (KMM/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Ramsey County ADC, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright dated June 27, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court’s careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The R&R [ECF 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. The IFP Application [2] is DEEMED MOOT; and 3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: July 27, 2022 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Eugene Laron Johnson, No. 22-CV-1123 (KMM/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Ramsey County ADC, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright dated June 27, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court’s careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The R&R [ECF 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. The IFP Application [2] is DEEMED MOOT; and 3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: July 27, 2022 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑