Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2022

Overcash v. Kijakazi

Overcash v. Kijakazi
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided September 19, 2022

Overcash v. Kijakazi

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Tiffany O., Case No. 21-CV-1033 (KMM/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated July 27, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 25] is ACCEPTED; 2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 22] is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 20] is DENIED; and 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: September 19, 2022 / Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Tiffany O., Case No. 21-CV-1033 (KMM/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated July 27, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 25] is ACCEPTED; 2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 22] is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 20] is DENIED; and 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: September 19, 2022 / Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑