U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2022

Vue v. Kijakazi

Vue v. Kijakazi
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided September 30, 2022

Vue v. Kijakazi

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Mai V., File No. 17-cv-4347 (ECT/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on September 12, 2022. ECF No. 55. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 55] is ACCEPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [ECF No. 47] is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $29,378.63; and 4. Plaintiff’s counsel shall refund $7,680.00 to Plaintiff Mai V., representing the EAJA fees previously awarded.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: September 30, 2022 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Mai V., File No. 17-cv-4347 (ECT/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on September 12, 2022. ECF No. 55. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 55] is ACCEPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [ECF No. 47] is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $29,378.63; and 4. Plaintiff’s counsel shall refund $7,680.00 to Plaintiff Mai V., representing the EAJA fees previously awarded.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: September 30, 2022 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.