Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2022

Aery v. Beitel

Aery v. Beitel
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided October 20, 2022
Aery v. Beitel

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

James Paul Aery, Case No. 22-CV-114 (KMM/TNL) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Ernie Beitel et al., Defendants.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated August 5, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s “Emergency Injunction,” ECF No. 16, is DENIED.

2. Plaintiff’s “Emergency Injunction/Restraining Order Rule 65,” ECF No. 21, is DENIED.

Date: October 20, 2022 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

James Paul Aery, Case No. 22-CV-114 (KMM/TNL) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Ernie Beitel et al., Defendants.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated August 5, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s “Emergency Injunction,” ECF No. 16, is DENIED.

2. Plaintiff’s “Emergency Injunction/Restraining Order Rule 65,” ECF No. 21, is DENIED.

Date: October 20, 2022 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.