U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2023

Johnson v. MCF - Moose Lake

Johnson v. MCF - Moose Lake
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided January 9, 2023

Johnson v. MCF - Moose Lake

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Eugene Laron Johnson, Case No. 22-cv-1915 (WMW/LIB) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION MCF – Moose Lake, Officer J. Mendez and Andy Turnboom, Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the October 12, 2022 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson.1 (Dkt. 11.)

No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee note to 1983 amendment; Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

Based on the R&R and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The October 12, 2022 R&R, (Dkt. 11), is ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff Eugene Laron Johnson’s complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

3. Plaintiff Eugene Laron Johnson’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkt. 5), is DENIED.

1 After Magistrate Judge Thorson issued the R&R, this case was reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois.

4. Plaintiff Eugene Laron Johnson’s letter requests (Dkts. 2, 6, 7 and 9), are DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: January 9, 2023 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Eugene Laron Johnson, Case No. 22-cv-1915 (WMW/LIB) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION MCF – Moose Lake, Officer J. Mendez and Andy Turnboom, Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the October 12, 2022 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson.1 (Dkt. 11.)

No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee note to 1983 amendment; Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

Based on the R&R and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The October 12, 2022 R&R, (Dkt. 11), is ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff Eugene Laron Johnson’s complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

3. Plaintiff Eugene Laron Johnson’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkt. 5), is DENIED.

1 After Magistrate Judge Thorson issued the R&R, this case was reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois.

4. Plaintiff Eugene Laron Johnson’s letter requests (Dkts. 2, 6, 7 and 9), are DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: January 9, 2023 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.