Henny v. Starr
Henny v. Starr
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Kimberly Ann Henny, Case No. 22-cv-1996 (WMW/JFD) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Mistelle Starr, Warden, of FCI Waseca, McIntosh, Associate Warden, of FCI Waseca and Andre Mousetavian, Regional Director for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Defendant.
Before the Court is the November 8, 2022 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John Docherty. (Dkt. 12.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The November 8, 2022 Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 12), is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff Kimberly Ann Henny’s complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. Plaintiff Kimberly Ann Henny’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkt. 4), is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 10, 2023 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Kimberly Ann Henny, Case No. 22-cv-1996 (WMW/JFD) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Mistelle Starr, Warden, of FCI Waseca, McIntosh, Associate Warden, of FCI Waseca and Andre Mousetavian, Regional Director for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Defendant.
Before the Court is the November 8, 2022 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John Docherty. (Dkt. 12.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The November 8, 2022 Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 12), is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff Kimberly Ann Henny’s complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. Plaintiff Kimberly Ann Henny’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkt. 4), is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 10, 2023 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.