Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2023

Gorski v. Matevousian

Gorski v. Matevousian
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided January 18, 2023

Gorski v. Matevousian

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Krissy Ann Gorski, Case No. 22-CV-2209 (KMM/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Andrew Matevousian, et al., Defendants.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, dated November 14, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted. Indeed, Ms. Gorski has not communicated at all with the Court in several months.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: January 18, 2023 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Krissy Ann Gorski, Case No. 22-CV-2209 (KMM/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Andrew Matevousian, et al., Defendants.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, dated November 14, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted. Indeed, Ms. Gorski has not communicated at all with the Court in several months.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: January 18, 2023 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑