Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2023

Johnson v. Little

Johnson v. Little
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided March 14, 2023

Johnson v. Little

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Eugene Laron Johnson, Case No. 22-cv-2229 (KMM/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Wayne Little, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated December 16, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction.

2. Mr. Johnson’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [Dkt. No. 3] is DENIED as moot.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: March 14, 2023 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Eugene Laron Johnson, Case No. 22-cv-2229 (KMM/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Wayne Little, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated December 16, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction.

2. Mr. Johnson’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [Dkt. No. 3] is DENIED as moot.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: March 14, 2023 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑